(C.) Estimating Servant Incomes In the 1688 Social Table for England and Wales
Source: Gregory King revised (Lindert and Williamson 1982). 
Step #1:  A crude low estimate uses assumed numbers of live-in servants,
by employer's social class: Guestimated number Their assumed
of live-in servants rate of pay =
"Heads    Total Per family, 0.6 times pay Cumul. Total
No. of Average per   income esp. those for labourer or % of % of expend.
Class families income(£) family" (£1000s) ≥6 persons Total no. outservant) families families (£1000s)
Temporal lords 200 6060 40 1212.0 34 6800 61200 0.01 0.01 1038.9
Baronets 800 1500 16 1200.0 10 8000 72000 0.06 0.07 1112.7
Spiritual lords 26 1300 20 33.8 14 364 3276 0.00 0.07 28.6
Knights 600 800 13 480.0 7 4200 37800 0.04 0.12 441.6
Esquires 3000 562.5 10 1687.5 4 12000 108000 0.22 0.33 1575.0
Merchants by sea, greater 2000 400 8 800.0 2 4000 36000 0.14 0.48 640.0
Merchants on land, greater 3264 400 6 1305.6 1 3264 29376 0.48 1107.8
Gentlemen 15000 280 8 4200.0 2 30000 270000 1.08 1.56 3900.0
Persons in offices, greater 5000 240 8 1200.0 2 10000 90000 0.36 1.91 1080.0
Merchants by sea, lesser 8000 200 6 1600.0 1 8000 72000 0.58 2.49 1440.0
Merchants on land, lesser 13057 200 6 2611.4 1 13057 117513 0.94 3.43 2215.7
Artisans and handicrafts 6745 200 4 1349.0 0 0 0.49 3.91 1214.1
Law 8062 154 7 1241.5 1 8062 72558 0.58 4.49 1055.3
Persons in offices, lesser 5000 120 6 600.0 1 5000 45000 0.36 4.85 540.0
Freeholders, greater 27568 91 7 2508.7 1 27568 248112 1.98 6.84 2299.6
Naval officers 5000 80 4 400.0 1 5000 45000 0.36 7.20 360.0
Clergymen, greater 2000 72 5 144.0 129.6
Science and Liberal Arts 12898 60 5 773.9 751.8
Military officers 4000 60 4 240.0 224.0
Freeholders, lesser 96490 55 5 5307.0 4864.7
Clergymen, lesser 10000 50 5 500.0 444.4
Shopkeepers and tradesmen 101704 45 4.5 4576.7 4386.0
Farmers 103382 42.5 5 4393.7 4174.0
Manufacturing trades 162863 38 4.5? 6188.8 6188.8?
Building trades 73018 25 4.5? 1825.5 1825.5?
Common seamen 50000 20 3 1000.0 1071.4
Part (C.), for England-Wales 1688, continued
"Heads    Total Total
No. of Average per   income expend.
families income(£) family" (£1000s) (£1000s)
Miners 14240 15 4.5? 213.6 213.6?
Laboring people & outserv'ts 284997 15 3.5 4275.0 4370.0
Common soldiers 35000 14 2 490.0 525.0
Cottagers and paupers 313183 6.5 3.25 2035.7 2290.2
Vagrants 23489 2 1? 47.0 70.5
All families 1390586 39.18 Servants Their pay
Resulting sums: 145315 £1307835
Step #2: Note that the summed number of live-in servants (145,315) is far below King's own estimates of numbers of servants (below).
Why the discrepancy?  The estimates from above refer only to live-in servants, whereas King's socio-occupational tables probably include
out-servants as well.  So for a high estimate, proceed as follows:
Servant 
In his notes (Laslett 1973, p. 61), King gets these numbers of servants: pay Servant pay as
65403 in London (London + towns =) Absolute group incomes (£1000s): (£1000s): % of income
87676 in towns 153079 Top 1%: 7849.5 1628.0 20.74
410000 in the country Top 5%: 19389.2 3888.4 20.05
563079 in all, which he views as 3.815% of the population. Top 10% 24532.9 5067.7 20.66
How to fit them in?   Top 20%: 31642.6 5067.7 16.02
Assume that the numbers calculated above represent the servants living in 
their employers' households, and  that the remaining 563,079 - 145,315 = Servant 
417,764 lived in their own homes and were therefore absorbed by King's  pay Servant pay as
"Laboring people & outservants." Absolute expenditures (£1000s): (£1000s): % of expend.
Then multiply the above distribution of in-servants by Top 1%: 6991.8 1628.0 23.29
3.8749, the ratio of total servants to in-servants. Pay them all Top 5%: 17254.7 3888.4 22.54
60% of £15 a year, to capture the mixture of adult men and women and child servants.   Top 10% 22002.9 5067.7 23.03
Top 20%: 28593.9 5067.7 17.72
Part (C.), for England-Wales 1688, continued
Step #3:  Our preferred, intermediate estimates start from the way in which the high estimate probably overcounts the number of persons
whose "servant" services are domestic-consumption services for their employers.  Many were servants to farmers, and much of their labor
was an input into farm production of marketed product, not into farm household consumption (Snell 1985).  Note that our guesstimated
number of live-in servants above (145,315) is close to the number of King's servants in London plus towns alone (153,079). 
Of the 410,000 servants in the country, assume that the services of only 33 percent, or 135,300, were for domestic-service consumption.
    This means that the total number of servants supplied to household consumption is 65,403 in London plus 87,676 in towns, plus 135,300
in the country, or a total of 288,379 servants  whose service was consumed in the household sector.  Of these, the 145,315 live-in
servants are about half.  Could the consumption of paid domestic services have been about evenly split between live-in
and outside servants for each class?  That would allow us to multiply the live-servants of Step #1 above by (288,379/145,315 =) 1.98451
for each class.  It is hard to say, but we indeed make that assumption here.  The preferred calculation of servant services by class is thus:  
Servant 
pay Servant pay as
Absolute group incomes (£1000s): (£1000s): % of income
Top 1%: 7849.5 833.8 10.62
Top 5%: 19389.2 1991.4 10.27
Top 10% 24532.9 2595.4 10.58
Top 20%: 31642.6 2595.4 8.20
Servant 
9.076815628 1 pay Servant pay as
11.79577927 2 Absolute expenditures (£1000s): (£1000s): % of expend.
11.54120576 3 Top 1%: 6991.8 833.8 11.93
Top 5%: 17254.7 1991.4 11.54
Top 10% 22002.9 2595.4 11.80
Top 20%: 28593.9 2595.4 9.08